Dynamic Accident Lawyers: Settlement Reached in Smartphone Privacy Class Action Lawsuit

smartphone class action lawsuit A privacy class action settlement has been reached between some of the largest smartphone manufacturers and a group of plaintiffs who allege their mobile devices were installed with wiretapping software.

On Friday, plaintiffs in the smartphone class action lawsuit In re: Carrier IQ Inc. Consumer Privacy Litigation asked a California judge to extend the deadline for filing a settlement agreement because they were unable to get all the signatures needed by that day.

According to court document filed Jan. 15, the parties anticipate that by Jan. 22, 2016 all signatures will be collected which should still give the court enough time to review the proposed privacy class action settlement before the Feb. 16 preliminary approval hearing.

The smartphone privacy class action lawsuit claims that the now defunct mobile software company Carrier iQ designed a program that could collect customer data from cell phones. This software was later installed on cell phones manufactured by Motorola, Samsung, HTC, LG Electronics and other companies, the plaintiffs allege.

According to the original smartphone class action lawsuit filed in 2014, this action violates the Wiretap Act because the device manufacturers were able to intercept the contents of electronic communications through cell phones. The plaintiffs claim that cell phone companies were able to collect text messages, user names, passwords and internet searches through the software created by Carrier iQ.

In January 2015, U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen partially dismissed some of the claims in the smartphone privacy class action lawsuit. In particular, the alleged violations of the Wiretap Act. Judge Chen also dismissed several different claims of violations of state law. However, he allowed the plaintiffs to amend the smartphone class action lawsuit and resubmit it.

By June 2015, the parties announced they had reached a global settlement in principal but struggled to finalize the exact terms. Although details regarding the settlement deadlock were not given, court documents showed that all parties participated in months of negotiations and mediation sessions.

“In finalizing the terms of the settlement agreement an impasse has been reached between the parties and the settlement agreement has not been finalized and signed,” stated the June 2015 letter submitted by all parties after four mediation sessions regarding the global settlement.

The court documents filed Friday stated that all parties reached a settlement agreement which is anticipated to resolve all claims of alleged illegal collection of customer data. The terms of the smartphone class action settlement is expected to affect millions of cell phone users.

To stay informed regarding the smartphone privacy settlement keep checking TopClassActions.com or sign up for our free newsletter for the latest updates. You can also mark this article as a “Favorite” using your free Top Class Actions account to receive notifications when this article is updated.

The plaintiffs are represented by Joseph H. Malley, Law Office of Joseph H. Malley, PC, Steve W. Berman and Robert F. Lopez of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Bruce L. Simon, Daniel L. Warshaw and William J. Newsom ofPearson Simon & Warshaw LLP, and others.

The Smartphone Privacy Class Action Lawsuit Settlement is In re: Carrier IQ Inc. Consumer Privacy Litigation, Case No. C-12-md-2330-EMC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

Email*
State*
selectAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyomingArmed Forces AmericasArmed Forces EuropeArmed Forces Pacific

jQuery(document).ready(function($){gformInitSpinner( 5, ‘http://11284-presscdn-0-40.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/images/spinner.gif’ );jQuery(‘#gform_ajax_frame_5’).load( function(){var contents = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘*’).html();var is_postback = contents.indexOf(‘GF_AJAX_POSTBACK’) >= 0;if(!is_postback){return;}var form_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_wrapper_5’);var is_confirmation = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gform_confirmation_wrapper_5’).length > 0;var is_redirect = contents.indexOf(‘gformRedirect(){‘) >= 0;var is_form = form_content.length > 0 && ! is_redirect && ! is_confirmation;if(is_form){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_5’).html(form_content.html());setTimeout( function() { /* delay the scroll by 50 milliseconds to fix a bug in chrome */ jQuery(document).scrollTop(jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_5’).offset().top); }, 50 );if(window[‘gformInitDatepicker’]) {gformInitDatepicker();}if(window[‘gformInitPriceFields’]) {gformInitPriceFields();}var current_page = jQuery(‘#gform_source_page_number_5’).val();gformInitSpinner( 5, ‘http://11284-presscdn-0-40.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/images/spinner.gif’ );jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_page_loaded’, [5, current_page]);window[‘gf_submitting_5’] = false;}else if(!is_redirect){var confirmation_content = jQuery(this).contents().find(‘#gforms_confirmation_message_5’).html();if(!confirmation_content){confirmation_content = contents;}setTimeout(function(){jQuery(‘#gform_wrapper_5’).replaceWith(” + confirmation_content + ”);jQuery(document).scrollTop(jQuery(‘#gforms_confirmation_message_5’).offset().top);jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_confirmation_loaded’, [5]);window[‘gf_submitting_5’] = false;}, 50);}else{jQuery(‘#gform_5’).append(contents);if(window[‘gformRedirect’]) {gformRedirect();}}jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_post_render’, [5, current_page]);} );} ); if(typeof gf_global == ‘undefined’) var gf_global = {“gf_currency_config”:{“name”:”U.S. Dollar”,”symbol_left”:”$”,”symbol_right”:””,”symbol_padding”:””,”thousand_separator”:”,”,”decimal_separator”:”.”,”decimals”:2},”base_url”:”http:\/\/topclassactions.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/gravityforms”,”number_formats”:[],”spinnerUrl”:”http:\/\/topclassactions.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/gravityforms\/images\/spinner.gif”};jQuery(document).bind(‘gform_post_render’, function(event, formId, currentPage){if(formId == 5) {gformInitChosenFields(‘#input_5_2′,’No results matched’);} } );jQuery(document).bind(‘gform_post_conditional_logic’, function(event, formId, fields, isInit){gformInitChosenFields(‘#input_5_2′,’No results matched’);} ); jQuery(document).ready(function(){jQuery(document).trigger(‘gform_post_render’, [5, 1]) } );

Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association

american-bar-association